- This is an elite institution, that is something to be proud of, said Nystrøm, saxophonist, composer and teacher of contemporary improvisation at NMH.
He emphasized the teachers' responsibility in making each student aware of their own artistic agenda. During the debate, he also called for a greater focus on artistic and critical subjects rather than business related subjects, which he feels current music education is directed towards.
- No one wants auditions to end, that they are exclusionary is the whole point, Habbestad pointed out.
At the same time, he referred to situations where some who have auditioned at NMH have not been successful because they have been perceived as difficult to teach - the studies are not tailored to their abilities and needs.
- We have to take that seriously, said Habbestad, and cited an example from the conservatory in Amsterdam where he himself did his diploma studies. Here they accepted 15 percent more students in the first year, and then they got rid of 15 percent in the second year. In this way, the first year became a kind of extended entrance exam, which gave both teachers and students the opportunity to test their suitability.
- The alternative is to take people in, keep them for four years and see that they get bad grades because no one has said, you are a great guy, but this is not for you, said Habbestad.
After just over an hour, there were more questions than answers, which Karlsen reflected in her summary:
- We want to be an elite institution, so we have to get hold of the best. So we must continue to debate, the best in what? As Rolf-Erik said, we need to foster a culture of critical thinking, I will take that question with me - how do we foster a culture of critical thinking in practices that can occasionally be perceived as conservative, even if we are not a conservatoire? And finally, can we imagine having different auditions for different types of studies?